Rasisme ilmiah

"Racial biology" baraliah ka laman iko. Untuak konsep biologis ras manusia, caliak Ras manusia.

Templat:Kotak sabalah pangobatan alternatif Rasisme ilmiah, kadang disabuik jo biologi ras,^[1]^[2] adolah kayakinan pseudosains basonyo tadapek bukti empiris untuak mandukuang atau mambanarkan rasisme (diskriminasi rasial), inferioritas ras, dan juo superioritas ras.^[3]^[4]^[5] Sacaro historis, rasisme ilmiah didukuang dek kalangan komunitas ilmiah, tapi indak lai dianggap ilmiah.^[4]^[5]

Artikel ko sadang disiapkan dan sadang dikambangkan, dan mungkin akan tajadi parubahan-parubahan gadang.
Sanak dapek mambantu dalam pangambangan laman ko.

Laman ko taakhia disuntiang dek 114.124.141.41 (Kontrib • Log) 3 hari 170 menit nan lalu.

Kok Sanak mancaliak artikel ko indak disuntiang dalam babarapo hari, mohon hapuih templat ko.

Media tantang Rasisme ilmiah di Wikimedia Commons

Artikel batopik kadokteran atau medis ko baru babantuak rancangan. Sanak dapek mambantu Wikipedia mangambangannyo.

↑ Weitz, Eric D. (2015-04-27) (dalam bahaso en). A Century of Genocide: Utopias of Race and Nation. Princeton University Press. ISBN 9781400866229. https://books.google.com/?id=29PyBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA355.
↑ Signer, Michael Alan (2000). Humanity at the Limit: The Impact of the Holocaust Experience on Jews and Christians. Indiana University Press. p. 202. ISBN 0253337399.
↑ "Ostensibly scientific": cf. Theodore M. Porter, Dorothy Ross (eds.) 2003.The Cambridge History of Science: Volume 7, The Modern Social Sciences Cambridge University Press, p. 293 "Race has long played a powerful popular role in explaining social and cultural traits, often in ostensibly scientific terms"; Adam Kuper, Jessica Kuper (eds.), The Social Science Encyclopedia (1996), "Racism", p. 716: "This [sc. scientific] racism entailed the use of 'scientific techniques', to sanction the belief in European and American racial Superiority"; Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Questions to Sociobiology (1998), "Race, theories of", p. 18: "Its exponents [sc. of scientific racism] tended to equate race with species and claimed that it constituted a scientific explanation of human history"; Terry Jay Ellingson, The myth of the noble savage (2001), 147ff. "In scientific racism, the racism was never very scientific; nor, it could at least be argued, was whatever met the qualifications of actual science ever very racist" (p. 151); Paul A. Erickson, Liam D. Murphy, A History of Anthropological Theory (2008), p. 152: "Scientific racism: Improper or incorrect science that actively or passively supports racism".
↑ ^a ^b Gould, Stephen Jay (1981). The Mismeasure of Man. New York: W W Norton and Co.. pp. 28–29. ISBN 978-0-393-01489-1. "Few tragedies can be more extensive than the stunting of life, few injustices deeper than the denial of an opportunity to strive or even to hope, by a limit imposed from without, but falsely identified as lying within."
↑ ^a ^b Kurtz, Paul (Sep 2004). "Can the Sciences Help Us to Make Wise Ethical Judgments?". Skeptical Inquirer. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 23 November 2007. Diakses tanggal 1 December 2007. There have been abundant illustrations of pseudoscientific theories-monocausal theories of human behavior that were hailed as "scientific"-that have been applied with disastrous results. Examples: ... Many racists today point to IQ to justify a menial role for blacks in society and their opposition to affirmative action.

[1] Weitz, Eric D. (2015-04-27) (dalam bahaso en). A Century of Genocide: Utopias of Race and Nation. Princeton University Press. ISBN 9781400866229. https://books.google.com/?id=29PyBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA355.

[2] Signer, Michael Alan (2000). Humanity at the Limit: The Impact of the Holocaust Experience on Jews and Christians. Indiana University Press. p. 202. ISBN 0253337399.

[3] "Ostensibly scientific": cf. Theodore M. Porter, Dorothy Ross (eds.) 2003.The Cambridge History of Science: Volume 7, The Modern Social Sciences Cambridge University Press, p. 293 "Race has long played a powerful popular role in explaining social and cultural traits, often in ostensibly scientific terms"; Adam Kuper, Jessica Kuper (eds.), The Social Science Encyclopedia (1996), "Racism", p. 716: "This [sc. scientific] racism entailed the use of 'scientific techniques', to sanction the belief in European and American racial Superiority"; Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Questions to Sociobiology (1998), "Race, theories of", p. 18: "Its exponents [sc. of scientific racism] tended to equate race with species and claimed that it constituted a scientific explanation of human history"; Terry Jay Ellingson, The myth of the noble savage (2001), 147ff. "In scientific racism, the racism was never very scientific; nor, it could at least be argued, was whatever met the qualifications of actual science ever very racist" (p. 151); Paul A. Erickson, Liam D. Murphy, A History of Anthropological Theory (2008), p. 152: "Scientific racism: Improper or incorrect science that actively or passively supports racism".

[SciRac_Gould-4] Gould, Stephen Jay (1981). The Mismeasure of Man. New York: W W Norton and Co.. pp. 28–29. ISBN 978-0-393-01489-1. "Few tragedies can be more extensive than the stunting of life, few injustices deeper than the denial of an opportunity to strive or even to hope, by a limit imposed from without, but falsely identified as lying within."

[SciRac_CSI-5] Kurtz, Paul (Sep 2004). "Can the Sciences Help Us to Make Wise Ethical Judgments?". Skeptical Inquirer. Diarsipkan dari versi asli tanggal 23 November 2007. Diakses tanggal 1 December 2007. There have been abundant illustrations of pseudoscientific theories-monocausal theories of human behavior that were hailed as "scientific"-that have been applied with disastrous results. Examples: ... Many racists today point to IQ to justify a menial role for blacks in society and their opposition to affirmative action.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]